Bruce’s Shorts | 4.20 – How to Choose a Video Codec

Choosing a professional video codec is tricky. Whether you want H.264, JPEG2000 or Perseus you need to understand the complex commercial and business compromises involved. In this short video Bruce Devlin highlights some of the issues that you need to consider..

Choosing a video codec requires serious thought as to how you measure the benefits of a codec. This is not which vendor to choose, but which codec is the best choice for your application. Take three examples.

1. In the UK, industry body the Digital Production Partnership (DPP) needed a specification for files for the exchange of content between broadcasters and their suppliers. They stipulated that the codec and its wrapper must be a recognized standard, the codec must be easily available on reasonable terms, and from more than one supplier.

2. Some video encoding is for archives like the U.S. Library of Congress. A mathematically lossless codec may be a requirement. How long does it take to encode, what compute resources does it need, what is the operational cost? What is the longevity of the standard?

3. Mobile devices like smartphones and tablets are used more and more to consume video. For this application bandwidth efficiency is key to codec choice. However, just as important is the need for low power consumption for the player application.

Choosing a codec is not just a technical decision, there are business economics that must be considered.  A standarized codec is the usual choice, but in a fast-moving world, other choices may be more suited to the business applicaton.

Click and view Bruce's succinct roundup of the issues.


Bruce Short's are released every two weeks on the Broadcast Bridge, with a wide range of topics around the issues of advancing technology in the media sector.

You might also like...

Next-Gen 5G Contribution: Part 2 - MEC & The Disruptive Potential Of 5G

The migration of the core network functionality of 5G to virtualized or cloud-native infrastructure opens up new capabilities like MEC which have the potential to disrupt current approaches to remote production contribution networks.

Standards: Part 8 - Standards For Designing & Building DAM Workflows

This article is all about content/asset management systems and their workflow. Most broadcasters will invest in a proprietary vendor solution. This article is designed to foster a better understanding of how such systems work, and offers some alternate thinking…

Designing IP Broadcast Systems: Addressing & Packet Delivery

How layer-3 and layer-2 addresses work together to deliver data link layer packets and frames across networks to improve efficiency and reduce congestion.

The Business Cost Of Poor Streaming Quality

Poor quality streaming loses viewers at an alarming rate especially when we consider the unintended consequences of poor error reporting on streaming players.

Future Technologies: Asynchronous Transport

In this first in a series of articles considering technologies of the near future and how they might transform how we think about broadcast, we begin with the potential for asynchronous transport streams.