Standards: Appendix J - MPEG-4 Licensing & Patents
Here is a list which shows whether each of the 34 parts of the MPEG-4 standard is encumbered with a patent.
This is an Appendix to our series of articles on Standards.
Read carefully where a standard describes whether patents apply to its use. It is usually very near the front. The authors may not have known which patents apply when the standard was drafted and the descriptions may be incomplete. It is worth the time and effort to research this before committing to the use of a standard to avoid license fees later on.
Details of the patents known to ISO are described in a downloadable spreadsheet but there may be other patents that they do not know about until the owner declares their interest in the standards:
http://www.iso.org/patents
This list of MPEG-4 parts indicates whether they are encumbered by patents:
| Part | Content | Patents |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Systems | Yes |
| 2 | Visual | Yes |
| 3 | Audio | Yes |
| 4 | Conformance testing | Yes |
| 5 | Reference software | Yes |
| 6 | DMIF | Yes |
| 7 | Reference software for A/V objects | No |
| 8 | Carriage over IP | No |
| 9 | Reference hardware | No |
| 10 | AVC | Yes |
| 11 | BIFS (Scene description) | Yes |
| 12 | ISO Base Media File Format | Yes |
| 13 | IPMP | No |
| 14 | MP4 file format | Yes |
| 15 | Carriage of NAL format video | Yes |
| 16 | AFX - Animation Framework | Yes |
| 17 | Streaming Text Format | No |
| 18 | Font compression and streaming | Yes |
| 19 | Synthesised texture stream | Yes |
| 20 | LASeR (Lightweight scene description) | Yes |
| 21 | MPEG-J extension for rendering | No |
| 22 | Open Font Format (OFF) | Yes |
| 23 | Symbolic Music Representation (SMR) | No |
| 24 | Audio and systems interaction | No |
| 25 | 3D-Graphics compression model | Yes |
| 26 | Audio conformance testing | No |
| 27 | 3D-Graphics conformance testing | Yes |
| 28 | Composite font representation | No |
| 29 | Web Video Coding (WVC) | Yes |
| 30 | Timed text and other visual overlays in ISOBMFF | No |
| 31 | Video coding for browsers | Yes |
| 32 | File format reference software and conformance | No |
| 33 | Internet Video Coding (IVC) | Yes |
| 34 | Bitstream Syntactic Description Language (SDL) | No |
The list will evolve because patents don't last forever (typically 20 years) and submarine patents do not surface right away. Almost all of the patents that encumber MPEG-4 Part 2 (Visual) have expired. The patents on AVC will take a little longer but will all have expired by 2030. HEVC will take longer still but eventually will be patent free.
Part of a series supported by
You might also like...
Designing IP Broadcast Systems: Integrating Cloud Infrastructure
Connecting on-prem broadcast infrastructures to the public cloud leads to a hybrid system which requires reliable secure high value media exchange and delivery.
Video Quality: Part 1 - Video Quality Faces New Challenges In Generative AI Era
In this first in a new series about Video Quality, we look at how the continuing proliferation of User Generated Content has brought new challenges for video quality assurance, with AI in turn helping address some of them. But new…
Minimizing OTT Churn Rates Through Viewer Engagement
A D2C streaming service requires an understanding of satisfaction with the service – the quality of it, the ease of use, the style of use – which requires the right technology and a focused information-gathering approach.
Designing IP Broadcast Systems: Where Broadcast Meets IT
Broadcast and IT engineers have historically approached their professions from two different places, but as technology is more reliable, they are moving closer.
Encoding & Transport For Remote Contribution At NAB 2024
As broadcasters embrace remote production workflows the technology required to compress, encode and reliably transport streams from the venue to the network operation center or the cloud become key, and there will be plenty of new developments and sources of…