The Difference Between Large and Small Diaphragm Microphones
When purchasing a new studio condenser microphone, buyers are immediately faced with the choice of small and large diaphragm types. What are the sonic differences, and which type is best for a certain application?
A rule of thumb is that a large diaphragm — or capsule membrane — is one inch or more in diameter. A small diaphragm means it is half-inch or less in diameter. In reality, many small diaphragm condenser microphones for audio recording use slightly larger capsules. There are also some large diaphragm microphones whose diaphragm size is slightly less than one inch. It can get confusing, since some manufacturers actually cite capsule larger than the actual diaphragm.
As Neumann wrote in a new tutorial on microphone diaphragm sizes, it doesn’t really matter to the end user. There are just a few things one needs to know. First, the distinction between small and large diaphragm is common only to condenser microphones. Some broadcast dynamic microphones are explicitly termed “large diaphragm” (such as the Shure SM7 or Electro-Voice RE20) but that doesn’t apply to the general usage of the sizes.
Diaphragm size, said Neumann, is often reflected in the entire construction of the microphone. Small diaphragm condensers usually are slim, pencil-shaped and operate end-fired. Large diaphragm condensers are usually much bigger and operate side addressed.
Historically, large diaphragm condensers came first. Early condenser microphones of the 1930s and 40s had to use large diaphragm capsules to overcome the noise of the tube electronics. A large membrane captures more acoustic energy, thus generating a higher signal voltage.
Small diaphragm condenser microphones with a decent signal-to-noise ratio only became feasible when dedicated microphone tubes and low noise transistors became available in the 1950s and 60s.
The main technical advantage of large diaphragm condenser microphones to this day is their noise performance. Neumann’s TLM 103, for instance, has a self-noise of only seven dB-A. That’s about six dB lower (i.e. half the noise voltage) than the self-noise figure of a state of the art small diaphragm microphone such as Neumann’s KM 184.
However, in all other respects, the small diaphragm condenser is the superior type, technically speaking. Its main advantages are excellent transient response (a small diaphragm can follow the sound waves more accurately), extended high frequency response (even beyond human hearing) and very consistent pickup pattern.
The latter point is of particular importance. When comparing the polar patterns of a small diaphragm and a large diaphragm condenser microphone at various frequencies, a well made small diaphragm condenser microphone has a very consistent cardioid pattern.
Sound, however, is much more than technical performance. The supposed shortcomings of large diaphragm condenser microphones are part of what makes them so attractive, especially for vocals and spoken word. The widening pattern at low frequencies, for instance, mollifies the proximity effect. In other words, the low frequency response remains beautifully lush, even if the speaker moves.
Large diaphragm condenser microphones shape the sound in a pleasing way. A good large diaphragm condenser encourages speakers and singers and gives them something to focus on in the absence of an audience. Apart from vocals and spoken word, large diaphragm microphones are often used for solo instruments to make them appear vibrant, rich and “larger than life.”
Small diaphragm condensers are the best choice when the desire is to capture pure and natural sound, without added flavors. No other type of microphone offers a more detailed sound image. Because of their neutral sound, high quality small diaphragm microphones can be used for almost anything.
When choosing microphones, there is no better or worse. Both large and small diaphragm condenser microphones are both excellent recording tools. It’s about choosing the right tool for the job.
Small diaphragm condensers offer an uncolored, neutral, very detailed sound image. Small diaphragm microphones are “realists.” Use them for anything that you want to capture just like it is.
Large diaphragm condensers are part microphone, part instrument. Their aim is to make the sound source appear bigger, more engaging and beautiful. They will give you that “sounds like a record” feeling.
Large diaphragm microphones are “romantics.” Use them to put the human voice and other lead instruments into the spotlight.
You might also like...
IP Security For Broadcasters - The Book 2026
Security is everyone’s problem. It is not just about having the right policies in place or knowing where the vulnerabilities in your network are; it’s about understanding how the network is accessed and by whom, and how to str…
Virtual Production For Broadcast: Video Wall Configuration
How video walls for VP are built in detail. We discuss the fundamentals of the underlying technology as well as techniques to ensure proper color rendering and avoid flicker while maximizing frame rate and dynamic range.
Standards: Audio - MPEG Layer 3 Audio Coding (MP3)
Launched in 1995, MP3 remains one of the most ubiquitous audio formats in the world. This guide explains how psychoacoustic compression works, explains the differences between MPEG-1 and MPEG-2 implementations, and finds out where MP3 works – and where it doesn’t.
Standards: Audio - Standards For Audio Coding
Audio coding demands very different tools and workflows to video, but the same fundamental principles around quality apply to both. This guide surveys the standards, codecs and container formats you need to navigate modern audio workflows.
Virtual Production For Broadcast: Camera Setup, Tracking & Lens Data
We discuss the changes that need to happen around the camera, what information we generate, and how that informs the pictures rendered on the screen.