The Difference Between Large and Small Diaphragm Microphones

When purchasing a new studio condenser microphone, buyers are immediately faced with the choice of small and large diaphragm types. What are the sonic differences, and which type is best for a certain application?

A rule of thumb is that a large diaphragm — or capsule membrane — is one inch or more in diameter. A small diaphragm means it is half-inch or less in diameter. In reality, many small diaphragm condenser microphones for audio recording use slightly larger capsules. There are also some large diaphragm microphones whose diaphragm size is slightly less than one inch. It can get confusing, since some manufacturers actually cite capsule larger than the actual diaphragm.

As Neumann wrote in a new tutorial on microphone diaphragm sizes, it doesn’t really matter to the end user. There are just a few things one needs to know. First, the distinction between small and large diaphragm is common only to condenser microphones. Some broadcast dynamic microphones are explicitly termed “large diaphragm” (such as the Shure SM7 or Electro-Voice RE20) but that doesn’t apply to the general usage of the sizes.

Diaphragm size, said Neumann, is often reflected in the entire construction of the microphone. Small diaphragm condensers usually are slim, pencil-shaped and operate end-fired. Large diaphragm condensers are usually much bigger and operate side addressed.

Historically, large diaphragm condensers came first. Early condenser microphones of the 1930s and 40s had to use large diaphragm capsules to overcome the noise of the tube electronics. A large membrane captures more acoustic energy, thus generating a higher signal voltage.

Small diaphragm condenser microphones with a decent signal-to-noise ratio only became feasible when dedicated microphone tubes and low noise transistors became available in the 1950s and 60s.

Neumann TLM 103 without head cover.

Neumann TLM 103 without head cover.

The main technical advantage of large diaphragm condenser microphones to this day is their noise performance. Neumann’s TLM 103, for instance, has a self-noise of only seven dB-A. That’s about six dB lower (i.e. half the noise voltage) than the self-noise figure of a state of the art small diaphragm microphone such as Neumann’s KM 184.

Neuman KM 184.

Neuman KM 184.

However, in all other respects, the small diaphragm condenser is the superior type, technically speaking. Its main advantages are excellent transient response (a small diaphragm can follow the sound waves more accurately), extended high frequency response (even beyond human hearing) and very consistent pickup pattern.

The latter point is of particular importance. When comparing the polar patterns of a small diaphragm and a large diaphragm condenser microphone at various frequencies, a well made small diaphragm condenser microphone has a very consistent cardioid pattern.

Sound, however, is much more than technical performance. The supposed shortcomings of large diaphragm condenser microphones are part of what makes them so attractive, especially for vocals and spoken word. The widening pattern at low frequencies, for instance, mollifies the proximity effect. In other words, the low frequency response remains beautifully lush, even if the speaker moves.

Large diaphragm condenser microphones shape the sound in a pleasing way. A good large diaphragm condenser encourages speakers and singers and gives them something to focus on in the absence of an audience. Apart from vocals and spoken word, large diaphragm microphones are often used for solo instruments to make them appear vibrant, rich and “larger than life.”

Small diaphragm condensers are the best choice when the desire is to capture pure and natural sound, without added flavors. No other type of microphone offers a more detailed sound image. Because of their neutral sound, high quality small diaphragm microphones can be used for almost anything.

When choosing microphones, there is no better or worse. Both large and small diaphragm condenser microphones are both excellent recording tools. It’s about choosing the right tool for the job.

Small diaphragm condensers offer an uncolored, neutral, very detailed sound image. Small diaphragm microphones are “realists.” Use them for anything that you want to capture just like it is.

Large diaphragm condensers are part microphone, part instrument. Their aim is to make the sound source appear bigger, more engaging and beautiful. They will give you that “sounds like a record” feeling.

Large diaphragm microphones are “romantics.” Use them to put the human voice and other lead instruments into the spotlight.

You might also like...

Learning From The Experts At The BEITC Sessions at 2023 NAB Show

Many NAB Shows visitors don’t realize that some of the most valuable technical information released at NAB Shows emanates from BEITC sessions. The job titles of all but one speaker in the conference are all related to engineering, technology, d…

Celebrating BEITC At NAB Show

As we approach the 2023 NAB Show in the NAB centenary year, we celebrate the unique insight and influence of the Broadcast Engineering & IT Conference that happens alongside the show each year.

Orchestrating Resources For Large-Scale Events: Part 4 - Monitoring Data For Efficiency & Forensics

Large-scale remote production systems can be complex and challenging to monitor, but IP presents many opportunities to capture and make use of rich data streams.

Orchestrating Resources For Large-Scale Events: Part 3 - Contribution & Remote Control

A discussion of camera sources, contribution network and remote control infrastructure required at the venue.

Orchestrating Resources For Large-Scale Events: Part 2 - Connecting Remote Locations

A discussion of how to create reliable, secure, high-bandwidth connectivity between multiple remote locations, your remote production hub, and distributed production teams.