Video Dropouts and the Challenges they Pose to Video Quality Assessment

The media industry is rapidly adopting file-based workflows in all stages of the content lifecycle including transcoding, repurposing, delivery, etc. Additional complexities could be introduced during media transformations, which if not handled properly, could lead to issues in video perceived by the end consumer.The issues are due to errors caused by media capturing devices, encoding/transcoding devices, editing operations, pre- or post-processing operations, etc. A significant majority of video issues nowadays are due to the loss or alteration in coded or uncoded video information, resulting in the distortion of the spatial and/or temporal characteristics of the video. These distortions in turn manifest themselves as video artefacts, termed hereafter as video dropouts. Detection of such video quality (VQ) issues in the form of dropouts are gaining importance in the workflow quality checking and monitoring space, where the goal is to ensure content integrity, conformance to encoding standards, meta-data fields and most importantly, the perceived quality of the video that is ultimately delivered. This end video quality can certainly be measured and verified using manual checking processes, as was traditionally the case. However, such manual monitoring can be tedious, inconsistent, subjective, and difficult to scale in a media farm.

Automated video quality detection methods are gaining traction……..

This paper discusses various kinds of video dropouts, the source of these errors, and the challenges encountered in detection of these errors.

While adoption of file-based workflows provided more flexibility with the basic paradigm of file processing, it has also added complexities during media transformations. Improper handling of these complexities can lead to perceived video quality issues for the end consumer. The issues are due to errors caused by media capturing devices, encoding/transcoding devices, editing operations, pre- or post-processing operations, etc. A significant majority of video issues nowadays are due to the loss or alteration in coded or uncoded video information, resulting in the distortion of the spatial and/or temporal characteristics of the video. These distortions in turn manifest themselves as video artefacts, termed hereafter as video dropouts. Detection of such video quality (VQ) issues in the form of dropouts are gaining importance in the workflow quality checking and monitoring space, where the goal is to ensure content integrity, conformance to encoding standards, meta-data fields and most importantly, the perceived quality of the video that is ultimately delivered. This end video quality can certainly be measured and verified using manual checking processes, as was traditionally the case. However, such manual monitoring can be tedious, inconsistent, subjective, and difficult to scale in a media farm.

Automated video quality detection methods are gaining traction over manual inspection as these are more accurate, offer greater consistency, have the ability to handle large amount of video data without loss of accuracy and moreover, can be upgraded easily with changing parameters and standardizations. However, automatic detection of video dropouts is complex and a subject of ongoing research. The source where the artefacts are introduced has a bearing on the way the artefact manifests itself. Automatic detection of the variety of manifestations of video dropouts requires complex algorithmic techniques and is at the heart of a “good QC tool”. This paper discusses various kinds of video dropouts, the source of these errors, and the challenges encountered in detection of these errors.

Let us know what you think…

Log-in or Register for free to post comments…

You might also like...

Why We Need OTT Monitoring – Part 2

In the previous article in this series, “Understanding OTT Systems”, we looked at the fundamental differences between unidirectional broadcast and OTT delivery. We investigated the complexity of OTT delivery and observed an insight into the multi-service provider silo culture. In thi…

Data Recording and Transmission: RF

In part 8 of the series “Data transmission and storage”, consultant John Watkinson looks at some of the intricacies of RF transmission.

Understanding OTT Systems - Part 1

In this series of articles, we investigate OTT distribution networks to better understand the unique challenges ahead and how to solve them. Unlike traditional RF broadcast and cable platform delivery networks, OTT comprises of many systems operated by different companies…

eBook:  Preparing for Broadcast IP Infrastructures

This FREE to download eBook is likely to become the reference document you keep close at hand, because, if, like many, you are tasked with Preparing for Broadcast IP Infrastructures. Supported by Riedel, this near 100 pages of in-depth guides, illustrations,…

Streaming Competes with Broadcast at Super Bowl LIII

Thanks to improved streaming technology, a lot more fans are going to be watching the Super Bowl on mobile screens.