How to De-Ess Voices When Recording

Whenever doing a professional voice recording, de-essing — the reduction of excessive sibilant consonants — is often a persistent issue. There are many techniques to get rid of this offensive sound from recordings of the human voice.

The problem comes when vocal sibilance, such as "s," "z" and "sh" sounds, are picked up in the recording. It usually lies in frequencies anywhere between 2–10 kHz, depending on the individual voice. Every voice is different, and the problem can come out of the blue at any time.

Excess sibilance can have many causes, including the choice of microphone, recording technique, compression, mix processing or even the way a person's mouth anatomy is shaped. Whatever the reason, if it appears, de-essing is usually called for.

A good start is to leave some space between the speaker and the microphone. Twelve to eighteen inches is considered a beginning point. Pop filters, by the way, won’t help with sibilance.

Upon finding a microphone-distance combination that helps, the microphone should be angled downward 10 to 15 degrees to place the zero degree axis toward the throat instead of the sibilant source.

Another possibility to avoid sibilance can be as simple as turning down the level of the signal of the voice. Sibilance can be detected on vocal waveforms as dense regions which can be seen with the eye. Though this is an old school method, it can become tedious.

Waves De-Esser

Waves De-Esser

This is where de-essers come in. De-essers are processors designed to cut the impact of the sibilant sounds. They work different ways, but generally use sidechain compression, gain reduction and sometimes parametric EQ to reduce the level of sibilant passages without altering the rest of the signal. The basic idea is to bring sibilance under control.

Dynamic Equalization De-Essing

Dynamic Equalization De-Essing

One kind of de-essing is dynamic equalization, where the gain of a parametric equalizer is reduced as the level of the sibilance increases. The frequency range of the equalizer is centered on the sibilant frequencies.

Another technique is side-chain compression or broadband de-essing. Here the signal feeding the side-chain of a dynamic range compressor is equalized or filtered so that the sibilant frequencies are most prominent. As a result, the compressor only reduces the level of the signal when there is a high level of sibilance.

Split-Band De-Essing

Split-Band De-Essing

Another is split-band compression, where the signal is split into two frequency ranges. One contains the sibilant frequencies and the other does not. The part of the signal containing the sibilant frequencies is sent to a compressor. The other frequency range is not processed. At the end of the process, the two frequency ranges are combined back into one signal.

The original signal can either be split into high (sibilant) and low frequencies, or split so that the frequencies both below and above the sibilance are untouched.

IZotope Nectar Voice Processor

IZotope Nectar Voice Processor

In the era of computers, the modern way to address de-essing problems is with automation of the vocal level in a digital audio workstation. Whenever sibilance occurs, the level can be set to follow automation curves that are manually set by the user. This method uses editing automation points directly.



As can be seen, there are multiple ways to deal with de-essing issues. The best for you may depend on the tools you have available at the moment. All tools may not work on all cases, so experimentation is needed. Where in the chain to de-ess can also change the effect, and many engineers have different preferred methods.

Manufacturers of de-esser plug-ins include iZotopeUniversal Audio, Sonnox, Fab Filter, IK Multimedia, SPL and Waves. Hardware de-essers are made by dbx, SPL, Drawmer and Manley. All are designed to tackle that one problem with the human voice.

You might also like...

An Introduction To Network Observability

The more complex and intricate IP networks and cloud infrastructures become, the greater the potential for unwelcome dynamics in the system, and the greater the need for rich, reliable, real-time data about performance and error rates.

Designing IP Broadcast Systems: Part 3 - Designing For Everyday Operation

Welcome to the third part of ‘Designing IP Broadcast Systems’ - a major 18 article exploration of the technology needed to create practical IP based broadcast production systems. Part 3 discusses some of the key challenges of designing network systems to support eve…

What Are The Long-Term Implications Of AI For Broadcast?

We’ve all witnessed its phenomenal growth recently. The question is: how do we manage the process of adopting and adjusting to AI in the broadcasting industry? This article is more about our approach than specific examples of AI integration;…

Next-Gen 5G Contribution: Part 2 - MEC & The Disruptive Potential Of 5G

The migration of the core network functionality of 5G to virtualized or cloud-native infrastructure opens up new capabilities like MEC which have the potential to disrupt current approaches to remote production contribution networks.

Designing IP Broadcast Systems: Addressing & Packet Delivery

How layer-3 and layer-2 addresses work together to deliver data link layer packets and frames across networks to improve efficiency and reduce congestion.