Cable Operators Still Losing Customers to OTT Providers in US

Cable operators in the US are still failing to match Internet TV players for quality of experience despite having their own multiscreen offerings, according to research commissioned by pay TV subscription, billing and CRM vendor Paywizard. Americans are being drawn to the higher level of customer service from providers like Netflix and Amazon according to the study, characterized by features like quick and easy signup, lack of contracts, free trials, instant account changes, transparent billing, and the ability to leave and return at any time.

It is clear that consumer concerns with cable TV services are more to do with inflexibility of the packages rather than quality of the content, although personalization and recommendation did emerge as factors in favor of the OTT providers. “Our research shows that Americans are placing far more value on customer service as a TV differentiator, as it becomes easier to join, cancel and move between services,” said Bhavesh Vaghela, CMO, Paywizard. “Viewers have had their fingers burnt by long-lasting and rigid cable subscriptions, and see internet TV as heralding a new era and leading the way for traditional players to follow – hence why cord-cutting and cord-shaving is gathering pace.”

Vaghela also cited helplines and guidance features as factors where the OTT players scored. “TV service providers would do well to consider just how great the impacts of proactive and personalized support functions can be in terms of securing loyalty and stopping users drifting to alternative platforms, as well as new approaches like offering skinny bundles,” he said.

The research based on consumer focus groups was carried out in New York during March 2016 by qualitative research experts Decipher, with the aim of discovering which factors motivate consumers to sign up to paid internet TV services and determine how long they stay with a service. It found that Americans are frustrated with poor customer service from cable providers that held a monopoly prior to internet TV and now desire a better, more flexible experience, which they are likely to reward with loyalty. American participants expressed opinions such as “I hate dealing with my cable company”, “it takes longer for them to get back to you” and that internet TV providers “are way better for customer service”. Conversely they praised internet TV providers for being “really responsive”, “reachable all the time”, having “different ways of getting in touch with them”, and willing to “bend over backwards to make you a satisfied customer”.

The aspects of customer service that consumers crave most from a TV service provider in 2016 are:

  • Contract free commitment
  • Simple, flat-rate pricing with little ambiguity
  • A free trial period to test the service
  • Simple and fast registration – no input of excessive personal information
  • Easy sign-in
  • Accessibility across devices
  • Personalization and recommendation features that work
  • Ability to make rapid account changes (upgrades/downgrades) onsite
  • Proactive and personal support features, such as web chat and helplines
  • Ability to leave at any time
  • Winback offers to entice returning customers

You might also like...

Video Quality: Part 2 - Streaming Video Quality Progress

We continue our mini-series about Video Quality, with a discussion of the challenges of streaming video quality. Despite vast improvements, continued proliferation in video streaming, coupled with ever rising consumer expectations, means that meeting quality demands is almost like an…

2024 BEITC Update: ATSC 3.0 Broadcast Positioning Systems

Move over, WWV and GPS. New information about Broadcast Positioning Systems presented at BEITC 2024 provides insight into work on a crucial, common view OTA, highly precision, public time reference that ATSC 3.0 broadcasters can easily provide.

Next-Gen 5G Contribution: Part 2 - MEC & The Disruptive Potential Of 5G

The migration of the core network functionality of 5G to virtualized or cloud-native infrastructure opens up new capabilities like MEC which have the potential to disrupt current approaches to remote production contribution networks.

The Streaming Tsunami: Securing Universal Service Delivery For Public Service Broadcasters (Part 3)

Like all Media companies, Public Service Broadcasters (PSBs) have three core activities to focus on: producing content, distributing content, and understanding (i.e., to monetize) content consumption. In these areas, where are the best opportunities for intra-PSB collaboration as we…

Designing IP Broadcast Systems: Addressing & Packet Delivery

How layer-3 and layer-2 addresses work together to deliver data link layer packets and frames across networks to improve efficiency and reduce congestion.