Late 2015: Updating Our UHD Expectations
Look for even more UHD, streaming and “Smart” features from the TV model introductions at January’s CES show. Above: LG Ultra HDTV 4K.
This holiday season will see a buying frenzy of UHD-4K televisions. But, where is the content for these high-rez screens?
When the first 4K televisions were brought to market expectations of future changes, beyond the fantastical 8K format, were modest: high-quality motion pictures would be the source of UHD programming; the anticipated 4K Blu-ray player might only need to support 24fps; streaming – the alternate source of movies – already perceived to require higher data-rates than most ISPs could deliver, could not be expected to support frame-rates higher than 30fps; cable/satellite operators were not expected to relinquish the bandwidth required by a UHD channel that few could watch because of the extraordinarily high-cost of a 4K TV; and advertisers needed OTA to deliver to a large audience.
The decision by CBS to exclusively stream Star Trek may indicate that OTA may not be the only way to reach a huge audience. Sports, at 2160p50 are already being distributed by BT (British Telecom) via streaming and by Sky, via satellite, to India.
Our updated expectations force a revision of what specifications are required for a UHD television. With Ultra-HD Blu-ray supporting up to 60fps, a UHD television must have at least one HDMI 2.0 port that supports HDCP 2.2.
Even before the first Ultra-HD Blu-ray player arrived, other 4K streaming devices have come to market. These include DirecTV’s Genie box (currently only movies), Roku 4, Fire TV, NVIDIA SHIELD, and TiVo BOLT. The 60p-ready Roku 4 box, Figure 1, features an HDMI 2.0 port supporting HDCP 2.2.
Figure 1: Roku 4 features an HDMI 2.0 port supporting HDCP 2.2.
UHD televisions have been designed to support Ultra-HD Blu-ray players manufactured by the companies selling 4K TVs. Not unexpectedly, they have only a single HDMI 2.0 port with HDCP 2.2. If, however, you anticipate enjoying multiple HDMI 2.0 devices, for example, a streaming box plus an Ultra-HD Blu-ray player, a single HDMI 2.0/HDCP 2.2 port will not be sufficient. Hopefully, this situation will end with the introduction of 2016 televisions at CES.
Ultra-HD Blu-ray players support several flavors of HDR. Most HDR systems require additional metadata. These data enhance video so when it is displayed it will have increased dynamic range. To pass metadata, an 18Gbps HDMI chip is required – an HDMI 2.0a port. The HDMI 2.0 chip in some, but likely not all, UHD televisions can be upgraded through a firmware download.
Most UHD televisions already have a suite of 4K streaming apps. Why would anyone buy a 4K streaming device? One reason – some UHD televisions, such as Vizio's M series, do not support Google’s VP9 codec so one can’t view YouTube 4K videos. The Roku 4 includes a VP9 codec and also has several new features – one of which was a surprise to me.
The Roku 4 can output multiple digital audio formats through its HDMI port and through its optical S/PDIF connector. Formats include PCM stereo, Dolby D, Dolby D+, Dolby D/DTS, and Dolby D+/DTS.
When streaming a small selection of movies from VUDU, the Roku supports Dolby Atmos audio. The Roku 4 also supports Dolby Vision because it does not require an HDMI 2.0a port. You can connect it to your $5999 Vizo Reference 65-inch monitor.
The surprise feature – a choice of 4K UHD TV and 4K UHD TV (10-bit) as shown in Figure 2.
To support H.265 10-bit video, a device must support the “MAIN 10” Profile, while 8-bit devices need only support the H.265 “MAIN” Profile. While acknowledging Roku’s MAIN 10 support, it’s important to realize that unless every link in the production, distribution, and display chain support 10-bit video, you’ll not see its advantages.
When UHD-2 televisions, both 4K and 8K arrive, they will support 10-bit with a REC.2020 colour space. Because both 8-bit and 10-bit video are compatible with REC.709, it’s likely a generation of UHD-1 televisions will be introduced whose internals and display panels are 10-bit capable.
The 4K Showcase app, Figure 3, has the usual suspects: Netflix, Amazon, VUDU, M-Go,ToonGoggles, and YouTube. Additional sources of 4K programs: Smithsonian Earth, Picasa, flickr, 500px plus the PLEX and the Roku Media Players that can play HD/UHD content from your Mac or PC and a micro-USB card, respectively. (Formats: MP4 (H.264), MKV (H.264), HEVC (H.265); MP3, Apple Lossless, WMA, AAC.)
Figure 3: Roku 4 offers Channel Store for 4K Ultra HD apps.
If you work in video production you may want to use a UHD TV as an editing or client monitor. Unless your computer system has a graphics board with an HDMI 2.0 port or you have a computer like Samsung’s ATIV Book 9 Pro laptop with an HDMI 2.0 port (Figure 4), your computer’s HDMI 1.4 port can only output 2160p24 or 2160p30.
Connecting my MacBook Pro Retina to a UHD display, the display switched to 30Hz as expected. Both 30p and 60p can pass though a 30p pipe – although every other frame of 60p video will be dropped yielding video with half the temporal resolution.
Figure 4: Samsung ATIV Book 9 Pro.
My question, how would an HDMI 1.4 connection treat 24p video? The display driver could output 24p video via HDMI, as do many DVD and BR players. A television’s design and your settings will determine how 24p will be displayed, e.g., will pulldown be added?
I played a 2160p23.98 YouTube movie (https://youtu.be/apJecSD2MJ0) on my MacBook Pro Retina at 3080x2400. As shown in Figure 5, I pre-checked the video using the Chrome browser to confirm its resolution and frame-rate. (Right-click on the video window and select “Stats for nerds.”)
Figure 5: Be sure to confirm a video’s resolution and frame-rate to ensure high-quality playback.
When the movie was played on the connected 3840x2160 display, the connection did not switch to 24p. On both displays, fast moving subjects showed the expected motion blur (Figure 7).
Figure 6: 2160p23.98 video -- Moderate motion.
Connecting devices to a UHD display worked well. I was particularly happy that the displayed Desktop looked fine at 30Hz.
For the Roku 4, the open question is will, or how will, it support HDR? Roku has stated, “There is no industry standard yet for HDR, even from TV manufacturers, and certainly none for streaming.“ While true, this avoids the reality that if the Roku had an HDMI 2.0a port, each provider’s app could be written to send its metadata to the UHD television. Thus, the TV would be responsible for correctly handling metadata. No streaming standard would be necessary.
You might also like...
The Big Guide To OTT: Part 1 - Back To The Beginning
Part 1 of The Big Guide To OTT is a set of three articles which take us back to the foundations of OTT and streaming services; defining the basic principles of the OTT ecosystem, describing the main infrastructure components and the…
Learning From The Experts At The BEITC Sessions at 2023 NAB Show
Many NAB Shows visitors don’t realize that some of the most valuable technical information released at NAB Shows emanates from BEITC sessions. The job titles of all but one speaker in the conference are all related to engineering, technology, d…
The Streaming Tsunami: Part 1 - Seeing The Tsunami Coming
Streaming video is on the cusp of becoming a major problem for broadband networks. Up to now we have been dealing with a swell in the streaming sea that has caused a few large waves to crash on to the…
Compression: Part 6 - Inter Coding
The greatest amount of compression comes from the use of inter coding, which consists of finding redundancy between a series of pictures.
FAST vs. Linear TV: Part 2 - What Are The Real Differences?
FAST can deliver the promise of true personalization intertwined with mass market reach. This heady mix can maximize advertising revenues from the large audiences currently turning away from traditional Pay-TV services towards free streaming services.