BEIT Paper Track: Recommendations for Professional Media Networking (PMN)

The speed and reliability of the internet has made it possible for broadcasters to use it as a cost-effective low-latency contribution link. A Monday afternoon BEIT session will explain what’s being done to make the internet perform best for broadcasters.

On Monday at NAB Shows, exhibits are always swamped with first-day visitors. Experienced broadcast engineers have learned that some of the most valuable engineering information isn’t often available in crowded exhibits, especially on opening day.

Upstairs in the quiet of meeting room N256 on Monday at 1:30 p.m. will be a presentation in the Cybersecurity and IP Transition Tracks “A performance Measurement Study of the Reliable Internet Stream Transport Protocol.” The topic will be presented by Dr. Ciro Noronha, Director of Technology, Compression Systems at Cobalt Digital and Jeff Littlejohn, Executive VP, Engineering and Systems Integration at iHeartMedia.

Dr. Noronha holds a BS and MS in Electrical Engineering from Instituto Tecnologico de Aeronautica, Brazil, and a Ph.D. in Electrical Engineering from Stanford University. He has worked in the compressed video over IP space since 1995. He shared an advanced copy of his BEIT 2019 paper with The Broadcast Bridge, which is the source of the following quotes and highlights.

“The speed and reliability of the Internet has made it possible for broadcasters to use the Internet as a cost-effective low-latency contribution link. Many companies have commercial products providing this functionality, and all these products are implemented as a variation of the ARQ (Automatic Repeat Query) protocol. The Video Services Forum (VSF) has published the TR-06-1 Reliable Internet Stream Transport protocol specification to provide interoperability between such products,” Dr. Noronha’s abstract says.

TR-06-1 Reliable Internet Stream Transport

There are numerous commercial products in the market that use ARQ to provide this functionality, some using proprietary implementations that do not interoperate. To address this interoperability issue, the Video Services Forum (VSF) started the Reliable Internet Stream Transport (RIST) Activity Group in 2017 to create a common protocol specification, and to promote interoperability between products from different vendors.

The RIST Activity Group selected the ARQ technique for packet recovery. ARQ was devised in the 1960s and can be found in most computer networking textbooks. The BEIT session will address how the ARQ protocol works, and what happens when a receiver detects a packet loss and requests retransmission.

RIST Activity Group also selected the Real Time Transport Protocol (RTP) [3] for the media transport. RTP is a very simple layer on top of UDP and provides sequence numbers to detect packet loss and timestamps to remove network jitter, if required. The use of RTP ensures that RIST-compliant systems can interoperate with non-RIST systems at a base level without packet loss recovery.

RIST selected the Real Time Transport Control Protocol (RTCP) [3] associated with RTP for the retransmission requests. Two types of retransmission request messages have been defined and will be explained in the session. A RIST receiver may use either type of message. An advanced RIST receiver may dynamically decide which message to use based on the loss pattern, thus optimizing the bandwidth utilization.

RIST and Firewalls

Typically, the sender and receiver are behind firewalls for security reasons. RIST Simple Profile only requires that UDP ports P and P+1 be opened at the firewall located at the receive site. The sender is configured to transmit to the public IP address at the receiving site.

The flow from the sender to UDP port P is unidirectional and will contain the audio/video content. The flow from the sender to UDP port P+1 establishes state in the firewalls at the sender and receiver sites; since the receiver directs its RTCP packets towards the source IP and UDP port of the traffic received in port P+1, these packets will be forwarded back to the sender. Since the RTCP flow from both sides is periodic, state is maintained in the firewalls.

RIST Simple Profile also includes IP Multicast support. Operation is very similar to unicast. RIST Simple Profile supports multiple paths between the sender and the receiver. The session will describe which scenarios are applicable for broadcasters.

At last fall’s IBC 2018, several companies participating in the RIST Activity Group presented a demonstration. Each company implemented the protocol directly from the Specification without shared libraries or code. A bank of RIST decoders were made available in Illinois. The various participating companies transmitted streams over the Internet from different parts of the world to the bank of decoders. The signal from the decoders was combined in a multi-viewer, and the output of the multi-viewer was published live to YouTube.

A set of measurements was performed using a real-time encoder transmitting actual audio/video content, a network simulator, and a real-time decoder. The results will be detailed in the session.

Packet Re-Ordering

The cost of adding a Reorder Section is added latency. The latency factor depends on the application. Some applications, such as live news, require low latency. Other applications, such as monitoring, may not. The cost of not having a Reorder Section is bandwidth efficiency: the receiver may request the retransmission of a packet that is still in flight and will arrive shortly. Since packets have sequence numbers, receivers can identify and discard duplicates, so other than the waste of bandwidth, there is no other penalty. More will be explained in the presentation.

RIST User Recommendations

When setting up a RIST Simple Profile link, a user will need to manually choose a few parameters to optimize the link. In the presentation, choices will be identified and explained, and recommendations outlined. For more details, attend the session.

Need a free exhibit hall pass? Click on this link and enter MP01 when requested.

Need a free exhibit hall pass? Click on this link and enter MP01 when requested.

You might also like...

Broadcasters Fail To Address Common Cybersecurity Vulnerabilities

Broadcasters are falling prey to common cybersecurity vulnerabilities as some struggle to adjust to the migration away from traditional dedicated systems to generic infrastructures based on the IP protocol, more like enterprises in other sectors.

Video Piracy Declines In EU

Media content piracy declined by an average 15% across Europe during 2018 according to the European Union (EU) Intellectual Property Office (EUIPO), contradicting the popular notion that the problem is getting out of hand in the streaming era.

Users Resist Tighter Pay TV Security

Video consumers are still reluctant to embrace more secure authentication methods than traditional passwords despite mounting fears over identity theft and intrusion into privacy.

The Proven Essentials to Ensure an Effective UI

Innovation in the media and entertainment industry is at an all-time high with devices, backend technologies, operating systems and consumer behaviors constantly evolving. A key element of this evolution is how viewers see, experience, navigate and consume the content they…

Verimatrix Looks for Content Security Converts on Back of AWS API Integration

Verimatrix is seeking to win major customers in broadcasting and pay TV on the back of API integration of its MultiRights OTT multi-DRM with Amazon Web Services (AWS). As AWS continues its strong advance into video services by claiming some…