Articles You May Have Missed – July 4, 2018

With World Cup Soccer top of mind, it might be a good time to review both camera design and audio capture technologies. How cameras are packaged has been a decided art for decades, but newer technologies like mirrorless capture and tapeless recording open new opportunities for camera shapes and features.

On the audio side, while standards can specify bit depth and rate, today’s capture and recording systems offer opportunity for alternative solutions. For the videographer, audio quality may become a long-distant consideration. As audience research consistently shows, audio makes or breaks the video.

The early ENG camcorder set a precedent for the design of should-mount cameras. A Sony BVW-1 Betacam from 1982.

The early ENG camcorder set a precedent for the design of should-mount cameras. A Sony BVW-1 Betacam from 1982.

Cameras have looked pretty much the same since days of the image orthicon tube. Some of the design is predicated on supporting an up-front long, heavy and expensive lens. But even that technology has improved with lighter lens material.

Today, cameras come in two basic use types; live and camcorders. The live camera design still resembles its much older predecessor, lens, box, viewfinder. But camcorders are now tapeless and one result is the development of a new breed of cameras that could be called cubic in shape; typified by the RedSony FS7 and F55, and the Canon Cinema series. These cameras can be configured in many ways to suite the need of the shot: handheld, shoulder mount, rigs, or the classic tripod.

In contrast, the DSLR camera has not changed form factor in the move from film to a digital sensor. The classic 35mm SLR comprises, side-by-side, the film canister, the mirror box and the take-up spool. Even the mirrorless interchangeable lens camera (MILC) retain a similar design.

With the end of the DSLR clearly in site, and the MILC taking over the question becomes, what further changes might we expect in professional camera design? Gain insight from David Austerberry’s article in The Broadcast Bridge, “Is There an Optimum Shape for a Camera?

Videographers sometimes forget about the importance of audio quality to any video content. That mistake typically comes back to bite them in post when they realize the audio sounds off-camera, muddy, or tinny. What happened?

One of the first audio technical parameters video producers should consider is the audio sample rate. Didn’t know that was an option? Read on. Like other technical parameters some might believe that higher sampling rates are better, right? The answer might be surprising.

As audio is digitized, two factors come into play: sampling rate and bit depth. The more samples per second, the better the audio quality. So, is the answer that simple? Maybe not. Learn more about sampling rates and bit-depth in Frank Beacham’s The Broadcast Bridge article, “Should Audio-for-Video Be Recorded At High Sample Rates?

IBC2018 is coming!

Let The Broadcast Bridge help you prepare for a busy convention. Special pre-show coverage is already live on our website. Don’t rely on out-of-date print newspapers for new product news. Get your daily dose of new products, technology developments, company show announcements and other pre-IBC2018 show coverage here at The Broadcast Bridge.

If you are not already registered, sign up for a free subscription to receive a daily, weekly or monthly custom email filled with content and technology that you select. Don’t wait for an out-of-date, month’s-old print version of “breaking events,” get your free membership to The Broadcast Bridge today.

With such a wealth of information generated daily, it is important to not get left behind.

Let us know what you think…

Log-in or Register for free to post comments…

You might also like...

Field Report: Canon EOS C200

When a company markets two products that seem similar, both targeting much the same task, but one costs significantly less, it’s reasonable to assume the less expensive product will offer significantly fewer features.

TV’s ‘Back to the Future’ Moment?

Philo T. Farnsworth was the original TV pioneer. When he transmitted the first picture from a camera to a receiver in another room in 1927, he exclaimed to technicians helping him, “There you are – electronic television!” What’s never been quoted but lik…

U.S. Transportation Agencies Ban Lithium-Ion Batteries from Cargo on Passenger Aircraft

The U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT) and Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) have announced a new Interim Final Rule banning the transportation of lithium-ion batteries in passenger aircraft cargo.

Server-Based “At Home” Workflows Provide Efficiency For NASCAR Productions

NASCAR Productions, based in Charlotte NC, prides itself on maintaining one of the most technically advanced content creation organizations in the country. It’s responsible for providing content, graphics and other show elements to broadcasters (mainly Fox and NBC), as w…

Special Report: Super Bowl LIII – The Technology Behind the Broadcast

New England Patriot quarterback, Tom Brady, entered Mercedes Benz stadium in Atlanta, GA on February 3rd having already won five Super Bowl games. And through four-quarters of play, all delivered by a television crew of hundreds of technicians, sports casters…