Edgeware Urges Content Providers to Follow Netflix by Building Own CDNs
Edgeware argues that many video players will pass the breakeven point at which it becomes cheaper to build their own CDN.
More content providers and video distributors should build their own CDNs as rising bit rates make this cost effective for smaller players.
This is the conclusion of Sweden’s video delivery technology vendor Edgeware, after conducting research finding that a self-built CDN is becoming cheaper than the alternative of an established CDN service even for many smaller players. This is more likely to be the case for operators serving significant numbers of subscribers within a confined geographical footprint.
“This is an approach that the major players like Netflix have taken. But as popularity of OTT TV grows, it’s becoming clear that it’s not just for the big guys,” said Edgeware CEO Joachim Roos. “Many of our customers have built their own TV CDNs, either to improve viewing quality or simply because the economics work better than paying into a CDN service every month.”
Of course Edgeware as a CDN technology provider has a vested interest in making the case for self-built CDNs. For that reason it has recruited analyst firm Frost & Sullivan to its cause, citing its recent report, Building Your Own CDN For Video Delivery: Why, When, And How. This supports Edgeware’s case that as content volumes grow, there comes a point where the cost of owning and operating a private CDN begins to look more attractive than pay-as-you-go.
Edgeware CEO Joachim Roos contends that self-build CDNs can improve video quality as well as save money.
Frost & Sullivan’s point seems to be that many operators already have their own broadband infrastructure anyway, which is coming under strain from the proliferation of unicast video traffic at ever higher resolutions and therefore bit rates. CDN technology enables that existing capacity to be used more efficiently through use of caching and link sharing between popular content. This suggests more that operators should incorporate CDN technology in their existing networks for greater efficiency rather than build substantial new infrastructure.
“The unicast nature of on-demand TV-Everywhere strains infrastructure,” said Avni Rambhia, principal analyst at Frost & Sullivan. “As OTT consumption grows, operators are aggressively seeking options to optimize use of their existing broadband infrastructure to maximize delivery capacity.”
To help content owners decide whether the time is right to start to deliver their programming on their own networks, Edgeware has developed a model for determining the business case for a self-built TV CDN. This works by balancing the number of regular users and how long they view content against the cost of equipment, software licenses, backhaul capacity, rack-space, power and operational staff.
“There are several metrics that drive the business case for or against a CDN service,” said Richard Brandon, CMO at Edgeware. “At a certain stage, there’s a tipping point that makes it worthwhile for content owners to begin delivering programming themselves, using their own system. If viewers are dispersed around the world, or popular content is only available a few times a week, then a CDN service is always going to be more cost-effective. But for many TV operators, who serve a well-defined geography and have a growing number of viewers watching every day, a self-built TV CDN can pay for itself within a matter of months.”
Edgeware claims to have benefited already from a trend towards self-built TV CDNs after going public in December 2016. It then posted an end-of-year annual increase in sales of 23.9%.
The firm is showing its TV CDN technology and presenting its self-build business case on booth SU9602CM at the 2017 NAB Show held at the Las Vegas Convention Centre between 24 - 27 April.
You might also like...
Learning From The Experts At The BEITC Sessions at 2023 NAB Show
Many NAB Shows visitors don’t realize that some of the most valuable technical information released at NAB Shows emanates from BEITC sessions. The job titles of all but one speaker in the conference are all related to engineering, technology, d…
The Streaming Tsunami: Part 1 - Seeing The Tsunami Coming
Streaming video is on the cusp of becoming a major problem for broadband networks. Up to now we have been dealing with a swell in the streaming sea that has caused a few large waves to crash on to the…
5G Broadcast Positioned As Revenue Winner For Telcos At Mobile World Congress 2023
Mobile World Congress (MWC) has become an increasingly relevant show for broadcasters and video service providers as more and more viewing takes place on smart phones, tablets and laptops, and as 5G networks becomes capable of delivering HD and even…
FAST vs. Linear TV: Part 2 - What Are The Real Differences?
FAST can deliver the promise of true personalization intertwined with mass market reach. This heady mix can maximize advertising revenues from the large audiences currently turning away from traditional Pay-TV services towards free streaming services.
Celebrating BEITC At NAB Show
As we approach the 2023 NAB Show in the NAB centenary year, we celebrate the unique insight and influence of the Broadcast Engineering & IT Conference that happens alongside the show each year.