From creation to broadcast to transmission, audio content requires similar processes but with different variations depending on where the content is in the workflow. This article will briefly discuss content requirements, workflows, and the role that Dolby E has as a part of this transmission chain. In each case, Dolby E based processing and other audio workflows are required.
Let us first consider the actual workflow used by three separate customers that are preparing content and sending it to one another. Content creation begins at a Hollywood studio, is then delivered to a broadcaster, and then the files are delivered to a playout centre. Whilst this particular example is an actual and real world implementation, there are many similar potential use-cases all over the world today.
Why Dolby E?
Videotape recorders and early playout servers only provided support for 4 mono audio channels. Users needed more audio channels. Dolby E was invented to efficiently package 8 channels of audio in a 2 channels. Dolby E also allows metadata relating to information about the program and the audio characteristics to be inserted into the data stream thereby allowing that information to be preserved as the content goes from production, post production and broadcast transmission. Although Dolby E was designed to work in a hardware based, real time environment, Dolby E is equally applicable and needed in file-based environments.
Dolby E can be used anywhere in the broadcast chain prior to the point where the audio will be delivered to consumers. Dolby E is never delivered to end users, but is instead decoded back to baseband, and then encoded into the required consumer format, such as Dolby Digital.
While file-based workflows proliferate, the Dolby E implementation provides challenges. There are a vast number of hardware based solutions but precious few for file-based operations.
Dolby E details
Dolby E can be encoded as 16-bit or 20-bit words. When 16-bit encoding is chosen it is only possible to encode four or six tracks of audio. 20-bit word length is needed if you wish to encode the maximum of eight tracks of audio.
This has an impact on the file type that will be used to contain the Dolby E encoded data. File types such as MXF or MOV usually have audio tracks for 16-bit words or for 24-bit words. It is not possible to include Dolby E encoded audio with a 20-bit word length into files that are created for 16-bit audio, and files with 24-bit word length would be needed to carry Dolby E audio encoded as 20-bits. Note however that conversely, 16-bit Dolby E can be placed inside media files containing 24-bit audio without limitation.
Dolby E uses a frame structure for the audio, and the audio frames must line up with the video frames in order to ensure that frame accurate editing is possible, and for switchers to be able to change source in a real time environment, without glitches in the audio. The guard band is used to ensure the video and audio data alignment is acceptable.
It’s important that file-based audio processing systems are able to measure existing Dolby E guard band and correct it when needed.
Use-case one: the content provider
A major Hollywood content provider needed to deliver content that required a number of audio workflows involving loudness compliance, track mapping, and Dolby E encode. Because the facility needed to create a dozen or so different workflows, they had a specific challenge.
They had to encode Dolby E with two key requirements: the first was to insert into every program they deliver, the program name inside the Dolby E container; the second was to automate the workflow process which required extracting the program name from the file name. Previously, this bit of the operation was manual and time consuming. We wrote additional code in our product, Emotion Systems' Engine, that enabled this as a part of the workflow and therefore allowed full automation of all the workflows.
Below is an example of the key workflow that the content provider required:
Use-case two: the broadcaster
This broadcaster received content from multiple suppliers. The result was a need for more than 20 different audio processing workflows. Whilst their post product department used edit suites for some of these workflows, it was a costly and time consuming affair. A particular challenge was the need to change the stereo inside a file that was already pre-encoded to Dolby. They had to do this because they were adding a commentary (AD – audio description, also known as video description in USA) track, which is usually done later in the processing chain. This complex process was not performed in house but rather outsourced to a post house.
The broadcaster would send the file to a post house, which added cost and time. When they evaluated the Engine, they immediately saw the potential to automate, to save money and make the process consistently repeatable. The result is that all the 20 plus workflows have been automated prior to delivery to the playout provider.
Use case three: the playout centre
MAM based automation is used to manage Dolby E and other loudness processes for a complete “end to end” workflow.
In spite of the automated workflow, the broadcaster was supplying content to the playout center with 14 different variations of audio. The playout center required the content to be normalized to stereo - stereo - Dolby E - Dolby E. In order for the playout provider to normalize the files and make them suitable for the playout server, 14 different flavors of audio workflows were required.
Normalizing files manually would be so labor intensive as to be nearly impossible. The process of normalizing to the desired format for the playout centre is now under MAM control and completely automated, saving countless hours and pounds.
Automated file-based processing for Dolby E
Keeping the Dolby E metadata intact and enhancing as needed along the way is a key requirement for a transmission chain. Loudness correction and other operations that are presently implemented through manual processes in edit suites are cost prohibitive and not scalable. With the rising amount of content that’s being generated and transmitted, new methods must be found for efficiency and high quality processing.
Engine from Emotion Systems is designed to enable scalable workflow automation and has a GUI-based interface enabling the creation of a wide range of workflows. The signal processing algorithms provide consistent and predicable results.
You might also like...
Two major developments that stood out for me this year - the acceptance that IP won’t solve all problems, and that Imagine Communications is making source code available to their clients.
Media asset management vendors are having to evolve as workflows move to the cloud. One way they are doing so is to segment part of their product offer into orchestration but – just as with MAM - it’s not entirely…
As broadcasting moves to highly efficient production lines of the future, understanding business needs is key for engineers, and recognizing the commercial motivations of CEOs and business owners is crucial to building a successful media platform.
Whether you are facing a move to ATSC 3.0 or need to change out RF systems, the recent NAB show provided plenty of options for RF engineers. For those more ‘grounded’, production efficiency was top-of-mind with attendees. Our editors review both…
Unity was in the air at the 2017 NAB Show for real time production over IP networks, with broadcasters, vendors and standards bodies coming together for the IP Showcase.