LiveU Unveils New Encoder

LiveU’s new ultra-small cellular bonding solution, the LU200 comes at a very attractive price, performance and form-factor for live video transmission. It weighs just over 500 grams, (1 lb) and is available in a pouch or camera-mount configuration. It includes two built-in modems with integrated powerful antennas providing a bonded solution for any application. The flexible LU200 can also serve as a stand-alone video encoder with satellite integration functionality, or be used as a LiveU DataBridge mobile hotspot for all IP applications in the field.

The LU200 supports two 4G LTE/3G modems together with Wi-Fi and LAN connections and includes LiveU’s proprietary antenna modules for extra resiliency. The LU200 is the latest offering within LiveU’s multi-layered live video ecosystem and can be locally or remotely managed via LiveU Central, the unified management system for LiveU’s field-units.

Let us know what you think…

Log-in or Register for free to post comments…

You might also like...

Color and Colorimetry – Part 2

At one time the only repeatable source of light on Earth was the sun. Later it was found that if bodies were made hot enough, they would radiate light. Any treatment of illumination has to start with the radiation from…

NAB 2019 – Technology vs Consolidation

Giving his unique view on NAB2019, Gary Olson considers and scrutinizes the big moving trends of consolidations, and casts clarity on the cloud, ATSC 3.0, and AI.

Data Recording and Transmission: RF - Part 8

In part 8 of the series “Data transmission and storage”, consultant John Watkinson looks at some of the intricacies of RF transmission.

How Live Production Benefits From Software-Defined Switching

As the myriad of live competition television shows continue to attract new and ever larger audiences for TV networks, producing them live has become so complicated that a second technical director (TD), often called a “screens TD,” is now often bei…

Field Report: Canon EOS C200

When a company markets two products that seem similar, both targeting much the same task, but one costs significantly less, it’s reasonable to assume the less expensive product will offer significantly fewer features.