Articles You May Have Missed – July 4, 2018

With World Cup Soccer top of mind, it might be a good time to review both camera design and audio capture technologies. How cameras are packaged has been a decided art for decades, but newer technologies like mirrorless capture and tapeless recording open new opportunities for camera shapes and features.

On the audio side, while standards can specify bit depth and rate, today’s capture and recording systems offer opportunity for alternative solutions. For the videographer, audio quality may become a long-distant consideration. As audience research consistently shows, audio makes or breaks the video.

The early ENG camcorder set a precedent for the design of should-mount cameras. A Sony BVW-1 Betacam from 1982.

The early ENG camcorder set a precedent for the design of should-mount cameras. A Sony BVW-1 Betacam from 1982.

Cameras have looked pretty much the same since days of the image orthicon tube. Some of the design is predicated on supporting an up-front long, heavy and expensive lens. But even that technology has improved with lighter lens material.

Today, cameras come in two basic use types; live and camcorders. The live camera design still resembles its much older predecessor, lens, box, viewfinder. But camcorders are now tapeless and one result is the development of a new breed of cameras that could be called cubic in shape; typified by the RedSony FS7 and F55, and the Canon Cinema series. These cameras can be configured in many ways to suite the need of the shot: handheld, shoulder mount, rigs, or the classic tripod.

In contrast, the DSLR camera has not changed form factor in the move from film to a digital sensor. The classic 35mm SLR comprises, side-by-side, the film canister, the mirror box and the take-up spool. Even the mirrorless interchangeable lens camera (MILC) retain a similar design.

With the end of the DSLR clearly in site, and the MILC taking over the question becomes, what further changes might we expect in professional camera design? Gain insight from David Austerberry’s article in The Broadcast Bridge, “Is There an Optimum Shape for a Camera?

Videographers sometimes forget about the importance of audio quality to any video content. That mistake typically comes back to bite them in post when they realize the audio sounds off-camera, muddy, or tinny. What happened?

One of the first audio technical parameters video producers should consider is the audio sample rate. Didn’t know that was an option? Read on. Like other technical parameters some might believe that higher sampling rates are better, right? The answer might be surprising.

As audio is digitized, two factors come into play: sampling rate and bit depth. The more samples per second, the better the audio quality. So, is the answer that simple? Maybe not. Learn more about sampling rates and bit-depth in Frank Beacham’s The Broadcast Bridge article, “Should Audio-for-Video Be Recorded At High Sample Rates?

IBC2018 is coming!

Let The Broadcast Bridge help you prepare for a busy convention. Special pre-show coverage is already live on our website. Don’t rely on out-of-date print newspapers for new product news. Get your daily dose of new products, technology developments, company show announcements and other pre-IBC2018 show coverage here at The Broadcast Bridge.

If you are not already registered, sign up for a free subscription to receive a daily, weekly or monthly custom email filled with content and technology that you select. Don’t wait for an out-of-date, month’s-old print version of “breaking events,” get your free membership to The Broadcast Bridge today.

With such a wealth of information generated daily, it is important to not get left behind.

Let us know what you think…

Log-in or Register for free to post comments…

You might also like...

Essential Guide:  IP - The Final Frontier

Today’s broadcast engineers face a unique challenge, one that is likely unfamiliar to these professionals. The challenge is to design, build and operate IP-centric solutions for video and audio content.

Essential Guide: Live IP Delivery

Broadcasting used to be simple. It required one TV station sending one signal to multiple viewers. Everyone received the same imagery at the same time. That was easy.

The Migration to IP: The Revolution Continues

Are you an IT engineer having trouble figuring out why the phones, computers and printer systems work but the networked video doesn’t? Or maybe you have 10-15 years of experience with video production equipment but really don’t understand why…

Essential Guide: Reality of IP

As broadcasters migrate to IP, the spotlight is focusing more and more on IT infrastructure. Quietly in the background, IT has been making unprecedented progress in infrastructure design to deliver low latency high-speed networks, and new highly adaptable business models,…

The Far-Reaching Benefits of IP-based Audio Stageboxes

Networked modular audio stageboxes have been around for a while and were hailed as a convenient alternative to clunky snakes and the huge patch bays that came with them. Unlike analog stage- and wallboxes, which usually only transmit signals to…