NVerzion Introduces ARAMYST Syndicated Programme Prep Tool

The highlight for broadcast automation specialist NVerzion during the 2018 NAB Show was the launch of the ARAMYST programme preparation system. This is designed to speed up the transcoding, topping and tailing and segmenting of shows distributed for syndication by automating all the processes involved.

NVerzion states that it carried out a "straw poll" of broadcasters and facilities using its systems to estimate how much time is spent preparing syndicated material. The company says this revealed that even at the most efficient operations, between ten to 15 minutes is devoted to transcoding and generally making a 30-minute programme going on to the PitchBlue platform ready for transmission. NVerzion says half-hour programmes in Pathfire format can take up to an hour to prepare.

ARAMYST is claimed to speed up the process considerably for both PitchBlue and Pathfire files. The system works with metadata from the syndication providers; this is used to divide programme into segments, ready for local ad insertion. Different IDs can be assigned to a number of channels, each aimed at different markets.

The automation is based on another new product, the NFinity broadcast video server. This runs on four simultaneous channels, taking material from any storage system connected over a network. It also has graphics and transition capability and can play "almost any file" in native format.

The NFinitityView quality control (QC) option is included as part of ARAMYST and provides a timeline of each segment plus media events in full resolution video. Using this operators can alter the length of segments and events, while at the same time managing the media database.

Let us know what you think…

Log-in or Register for free to post comments…

You might also like...

OTT - What and Where to Monitor – Part 3

In the last two articles in this series we looked at why we need to monitor in OTT. Then, through analysing a typical OTT distribution chain, we sought to understand where the technical points of demarcation and challenges arise. In…

Why We Need OTT Monitoring – Part 2

In the previous article in this series, “Understanding OTT Systems”, we looked at the fundamental differences between unidirectional broadcast and OTT delivery. We investigated the complexity of OTT delivery and observed an insight into the multi-service provider silo culture. In thi…

Understanding OTT Systems - Part 1

In this series of articles, we investigate OTT distribution networks to better understand the unique challenges ahead and how to solve them. Unlike traditional RF broadcast and cable platform delivery networks, OTT comprises of many systems operated by different companies…

TV’s ‘Back to the Future’ Moment?

Philo T. Farnsworth was the original TV pioneer. When he transmitted the first picture from a camera to a receiver in another room in 1927, he exclaimed to technicians helping him, “There you are – electronic television!” What’s never been quoted but lik…

Cost-effective IP Contribution and Distribution

Saving dollars is one of the reasons broadcasters are moving to IP. Network speeds have now reached a level where real-time video and audio distribution is a realistic option. Taking this technology to another level, Rohde and Schwarz demonstrate in…