Many stations are forced by terrain to rely on Single Frequency Networks (SFN) to augment station coverage. While simple in concept, the real-world design, installation and operation can be a challenge. In this two-part series, broadcast engineer, Ned Soseman, offers an examination of his experience with multiple SFN transmitters, which provide coverage to key populations spread through the hilly Ozark Mountain’s terrain. If you have, or are planning to install SFN transmitters, his experience may prove invaluable. Read on.
As broadcast and production professionals look forward to NAB 2018, thoughts center on expected new technology. What will be some key products and technology, what about new workflows, what surprises may greet attendees?
The answers to such questions, for the most part, lie hidden inside the offices of exhibitors. Some companies are reluctant to release advance information on their technology and displays. Others are excited about show opportunities and willingly provide advance information to entice attendees to visit their booths. The Broadcast Bridge editors are well connected to NAB show 2018 exhibitors and will bring readers the most up-to-date information on all the new products and technology. Don’t miss a day without your free customized The Broadcast Bridge newsletter. Sign up here.
Is broadcast TV ready for hyper-local transmission?
Interest in TV SFNs is growing because ATSC 3.0 is designed to leverage the technology for maximum bandwidth, and Pearl and Sinclair scouting the trail to a new way of broadcasting. SFNs aren’t new. Springfield MO Fox affiliate KRBK has been operating a multi-transmitter ATSC 1.0 SFN for several years. How is 3.0 going to be different?
Learn if SFN might be a solution to your station’s delivery challenge in the article, “Pros and Cons of a TV SFN in US Market 75: Part 1.”
The KRBK SFN transmitter site, 5 miles north of Halfway MO, is the one tower the station owns. The satellite dish is the STL.
In part 2 of this series, broadcast engineer Ned Soseman reviews key differences in underlying ATSC 1.0 versus 3.0 technology and the effect that may have on SFN placement. He notes that while reliability of SFN transmitters is crucial, some SFN sites can be more crucial than others, such as the ones that cover areas where the most viewers and sponsors are located. Soseman reviews important keys to maintaining a reliable SFN, especially in today’s repack and ATSC 3.0 world.
NAB 2018 is coming!
Let The Broadcast Bridge help you prepare for a busy convention. Special pre-show coverage began on February 19, 2018. Don’t rely on out-of-date print newspapers for new product news. Get your daily dose of new products, technology developments, company show announcements and other pre-NAB show coverage here at The Broadcast Bridge.
If you are not already registered, sign up for a free subscription to receive a daily, weekly or monthly custom email filled with content and technology that you select. Don’t wait for an out-of-date, month’s-old print version of “breaking events,” get your free membership to The Broadcast Bridge today.
With such a wealth of information generated daily, it is important to not get left behind.
You might also like...
KMSS lights up a new liquid-cooled transmitter system with just 30 days to TV’s most-watched event.
The 2nd generation of local broadcast TV professionals is retiring. Who will replace them and where will they lead local TV?
987 TV stations have either completed repacking or are in progress. With three tight deadlines looming before the FCC Repack schedule concludes in 5 months, will stations, vendors and crews be able to maintain the pace?
Development of new technology and moving to the newly available 5GHz spectrum continue to expand the creative and technical possibilities for audio across live performance and broadcast productions.
Sinclair becomes the 9th member to join the Pearl organization as local TV stations prepare to roll out NEXTGEN TV in top US markets this year.